Free Da 2166 9 1 Template in PDF

Understanding the DA Form 2166-9-1 is essential for non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the Army. However, several misconceptions about this form can lead to confusion. Here are ten common misconceptions:

• The form is optional for NCOs. Many believe that submitting the DA Form 2166-9-1 is not mandatory. In reality, it is a required evaluation tool for NCOs.
• Only the rater completes the form. Some think that only the rater is responsible for filling out the form. However, both the rater and senior rater play crucial roles in the evaluation process.
• The NCO's signature indicates agreement with the evaluation. There is a misconception that signing the form means the NCO agrees with the assessments. The signature merely verifies that the administrative data is correct.
• The form only evaluates job performance. Many assume that the evaluation focuses solely on job performance. In fact, it also assesses professionalism, attributes, and competencies.
• All comments on the form are mandatory. Some believe every section requires comments. While comments are encouraged, they are not always mandatory for every evaluation area.
• The DA Form 2166-9-1 is the same for all ranks. There is a misconception that the form is uniform across all NCO ranks. Different forms exist for various ranks, each tailored to specific evaluation criteria.
• Performance evaluations are only for promotions. Some think these evaluations are solely for promotion purposes. They also serve to provide feedback and support professional development.
• Rated months are not important. Many overlook the significance of rated months on the form. Accurate reporting of rated months is crucial for proper evaluation and career progression.
• The form can be submitted without a supplementary reviewer. Some believe the form is complete without a supplementary review. However, the supplementary review can enhance the evaluation's credibility.
• Once submitted, the evaluation cannot be changed. There is a belief that after submission, the evaluation is final. In reality, there are processes in place for appeals and corrections if necessary.

Understanding these misconceptions can help NCOs navigate the evaluation process more effectively and ensure they are accurately represented in their assessments.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used in the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) within the U.S. Army. However, it is often accompanied by several other forms and documents that play a crucial role in the evaluation and administrative processes. Below is a list of commonly used forms that complement the DA Form 2166-9-1.

• DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is the NCO Evaluation Report for the higher grade NCOs. It serves a similar purpose as the DA Form 2166-9-1 but is specifically designed for evaluating NCOs in higher ranks, ensuring a comprehensive assessment across different levels of leadership.
• DA Form 1059: This is the Academic Evaluation Report. It documents the performance of soldiers in military schools and training courses. This form is important for providing a broader context of an NCO's capabilities and achievements beyond their regular duties.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, this document is used for recording counseling sessions. It helps in tracking an NCO's professional development and performance issues, which can be referenced during evaluations.
• Boat Bill of Sale: A crucial document for validating the sale of a boat, ensuring the buyer's protection and the seller's record-keeping, further details can be found at OnlineLawDocs.com.
• DA Form 3349: This is the Physical Profile form. It is used to document any physical limitations or profiles that an NCO may have. This information is critical for understanding how physical capabilities may impact performance evaluations.
• DA Form 7500: The Army's Performance and Evaluation System (PES) form assists in providing a standardized method for evaluating NCOs. It helps ensure that evaluations are consistent and fair across the board.
• AR 623-3: This Army Regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the evaluation of Army personnel. It serves as a foundational document that guides the completion of the DA Form 2166-9-1 and other related forms.

Each of these documents plays a vital role in the overall evaluation process of NCOs. They provide a comprehensive view of an individual’s performance, capabilities, and potential for future roles within the Army. Understanding these forms can help ensure that evaluations are thorough, fair, and beneficial for the soldier’s career progression.

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process, but many individuals make critical mistakes that can lead to delays or complications in the evaluation process. Understanding these common pitfalls is essential for ensuring that your submission is accurate and complete.

One frequent mistake is failing to provide complete administrative data in Part I. This section requires specific information such as name, SSN, and unit information. Omitting any of these details can result in processing delays. Always double-check that all fields are filled out correctly and that the information matches official records.

Another common error occurs when individuals do not verify the rated NCO's email address. Providing an incorrect email can hinder communication regarding the evaluation report. Ensure that the email address ends with .gov or .mil, as this is a requirement. This step is crucial for maintaining effective correspondence with the rating officials.

Many people also overlook the importance of accurate dates in the counseling section. Dates should reflect when the counseling occurred, and discrepancies can lead to confusion about the evaluation timeline. It is vital to record these dates accurately to avoid complications later in the review process.

In Part III, the duty description often lacks sufficient detail. This section should clearly outline daily duties, areas of special emphasis, and appointed duties. Providing vague or incomplete descriptions can undermine the evaluation's effectiveness. Take the time to articulate responsibilities clearly and comprehensively.

Furthermore, mistakes are frequently made in the performance evaluation section. Evaluators may not provide adequate comments for areas marked as “did not meet standard.” This omission can lead to misunderstandings about performance issues. It is essential to include constructive feedback, as it helps clarify the evaluation and provides valuable insight for the rated NCO.

Another error involves the overall potential rating in Part V. Selecting a box without thoughtful consideration can misrepresent the rated NCO’s capabilities. Evaluators should take the time to reflect on the NCO’s performance relative to peers before making a selection. This careful assessment is crucial for accurate representation.

Lastly, failing to secure necessary signatures can halt the evaluation process. Each section requires signatures from the rater, senior rater, and supplementary reviewer where applicable. Ensure that all required signatures are obtained before submission. Missing signatures can lead to delays and may require resubmission of the form.

By being aware of these common mistakes, individuals can take proactive steps to ensure their DA 2166-9-1 form is filled out accurately and completely. Attention to detail is key in this process, and it can significantly impact the evaluation outcome.